Since he took office, President Obama has repeatedly emphasized his commitment to selecting the most qualified and experienced candidates in his appointments. In choosing a nominee for the Supreme Court, the president has expressed also that he will seek a candidate who identifies with people’s hopes and struggles and who is committed to upholding Constitutional values. He has all of this and more in federal appellate Judge Sonia Sotomayor.

Sotomayor is a brilliant jurist who would bring a wealth of judicial experience to the Court. As a Supreme Court justice, Sotomayor would be one of only three justices who have served as state prosecutors or Assistant U.S. Attorneys. She would also be the only Supreme Court justice with experience as a trial court judge. Indeed, the last appointee to the Supreme Court with more experience than Sotomayor—Justice Benjamin Cardozo— was named in 1932.

National leaders of different political camps have recognized Sotomayor’s potential to contribute at the highest level of our judicial branch. President George H.W. Bush recognized Sotomayor’s stellar credentials in both the private and public sector when he appointed her to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. President Bill Clinton also saw in her an accomplished judge and a sharp legal mind when he appointed her to the Second Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals.

Senators Charles Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand, Governor David Paterson, and Sotomayor’s former boss Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau—who called her a “fearless and effective prosecutor”—have all voiced high praise for her skills, qualifications and judicial temperament.

Those who have directly interacted with Sotomayor—from clerks to lawyers— have called her a tough but fair judge. Professor and legal scholar Robin Kar, who clerked for Sotomayor, wrote about her record as a jurist: “In my view, the level of conviction and independence of mind that Judge Sotomayor displays is absolutely essential to the best work of a Supreme Court Justice, but it is in short demand, and rarely have we seen it on such full display in the federal judiciary.”